Car Accidents and the Sudden Emergency Doctrine

Insurance Company Denies Liability Based On Sudden Emergency

Let us assume that you have had a car accident in Georgia and you call the at fault driver's car insurance company and they tell you they are not responsible for the crash because it was the result of a "sudden emergency." What the heck is that? How do I fight it?

Georgia law defines a sudden emergency as a sudden danger caused without the defendants contribution and which forced them to choose a course of action without sufficient time for thought such that if they act negligently, it is only because of the lack of time to pick the wisest path. Matheson v. Stilkenboom, 251 Ga.App. 693, 696 (2001).

Typically the defendant wants to have the jury charged on the doctrine of sudden emergency because it allows their lawyer to argue the crash was not their fault because they did not have enough time to react. It reads that a person is not negligent if they act according to their best interest or in the most apparently judicious manner due to insufficient time to deal with the situation in a reasoned manner. Beringause v. Fogleman Truck Lines 200 Ga. App. 822 (1991)

A good example of the use of the defense can be found in the case of Maxineau v. King. There, the defendant swore he was driving in an open lane of traffic when a car merged in front of him from the on ramp and suddenly hit the brakes.  Maxineau had to choose between hitting the car in front or switching lanes to the left to hit King's truck. Even though King had a totally different story about how the crash occurred, the Judge was obligated to give the jury the charge and to leave it to the jurors to decide what story is more believable.

One way in which the defense pops up is with wildlife in the roadway, such as a deer. We represented the widow of a preacher who died when a schoolteacher was driving home and swerved to avoid the deer. She swerved into the oncoming land and killed the driver coming in the other direction. The insurance carrier wanted to argue sudden emergency, act of God, but because we were able to show that the deer did not actually make contact, there was still a strong liability argument that the driver simply overreacted to the situation. Remember that the core concept here is time and reaction. The less time to react, the less judgmental a jury will be. The more time to react, the more likely they will be to hold you to a normal negligence standard.

Another area that you will see the defense pop up in is where the insurance company wants to argue that the defendant driver had a sudden medical emergency. We often see this with diabetic episodes and other random syncope episodes. The key here is the medical history of the driver. If they have truly never had a heart attack before and one hits them out of the blue, then yes, there is no negligence and the cause of the crash was a sudden emergency. Often that is not the case and the insurance company has to sort through the defendant driver often claiming that the medical condition was unknown.

What about the diabetes situation? It does not matter that this is the first time you blacked out. What matters is you were put on notice that if you do not monitor your blood sugar, you are taking the chance that you will crash your car. That in an of itself is a separate act of negligence.

If you are speaking with an insurance adjuster on a Georgia car accident and they start talking about the sudden emergency doctrine, be on your toes and call a good Atlanta car accident lawyer to go over the facts.

Client Reviews
My wife and I were hit by a tractor trailer in 2014. After extensive research online, we were deeply impressed with the various reviews we read on Google and Avvo and chose Chris to represent us. We could not have a made a better decision. Chris and his firm treated us like we were their only clients, soothed our worries, and instantly gained our trust. Chris settled both of our cases for more than we expected. James
A co-worker of my wife recommended Chris to us. At the very beginning Chris showed that he cared and his knowledge is priceless. Going through this process can be aggravating but Chris did a great job guiding me through this and was always available to answer my questions. Chris fought to get what I deserved even though at times I wanted to give up. Tracy
I want to express my deepest sense of gratitude and appreciation to Attorney Chris Simon & Attorney Chris Carsten, for all the hard work that they put forth into my case (car accident filed after being hit by drunk driver). Their attention to detail and professionalism far surpasses their firm's reputation. Because of their diligence and dedication to their craft, they were able to bring my case to a successful close, one that I could live with. You will not find a better team for your case. Should I have a need for their services again in the future, or know of anyone looking for a top notch Auto Accident Law Firm, I would not hesitate to recommend them!!!! Elle
Wow...Chris is a very good attorney. Me and my son was in a very bad car accident an I was clueless on how to handle the situation. It's very hard to find an attorney who allows you to contact them personally instead of you contacting their asst. I was told that I didn't have a case because the hosiptal put a lien on my acct. Chris prove different and I was able to file my case with the insurance company. The process was very quickly and Im glad I selected the right attorney..Thanks Chris A Car Accident client
Chris is a great lawyer and the most people friendly attorney I have ever delt with. He handled my case with great attention to detail and did so in a very short period of time. He is very consice, efficient, patient and understanding. He has a strong passion for what he does and he does it well. I recommend Chris Simon as legal representation for anyone who has suffreed damages or a loss at the negligence of others. He really cares about you and your case. A Car Accident client