Medical Deposition Outline for Injury Case

Outline for Medical Deposition.doc

Put objections on tape

        MEDICAL DEPOSITION

Qualifications of doctor

Name, profession and address

License to practice in State

How long engaged in practice

Medical training

Specialties

Member of Medical Societies

Member of Hospital Staffs

Boards

Authorships

Have occasion to treat plaintiff in this case.

Examination

I retained you to review mr. Loner’s films several weeks ago

Have you reviewed his films?

Have you ever met ed loner.

Is it necessary to meet the patient to do your job,

is it beneficial

have you reviewed any of his medical records?

Would that be helpful at all?

Did you prepare a written report

What films did you look at

Identify as exhibits and tender.

What is the earliest film you reviewed from mr. Loner?

What were the circumstances of that visit.

What did it show.

Can you show the jury where that is

What was the next film?

What does that tell us about the condition of his spine?

Have you read materials on trauma tears in the vertebrates

What is the disk made of is it strong?

What would it take to herniate it.

What is degenerative disk disease

What is arthritis in the back

You are not a surgeon right

Don’t operate on people.

You specialize in reading xrays, mris and cat scans

More qualified than a surgeon to do that right

Have you been retained by my firm in the past in the course of representing clients?

Have you ever done work for mr. Rickards old firm. Chambers mabry and mcclelland?

You have been paid by my client to examine mr. Loners films.

How does that affect your judgment and opinion on the evidence.

How much of your business involves reviewing films were the patient is not involved in lawsuit and you are doing it from a healing standpoint.

General

First time saw plaintiff

Examination at that time

Where examination held

Was plaintiff cooperative

History

History from plaintiff

History from other sources

Physical Examination

Nature of plaintiff’s complaints

Inquiry as to limitation of motion

Results of inquiry

Was the possible presence of pain an essential

part of the diagnosis

Did you attempt manipulation of injured part

If so, what findings

Did plaintiff complain of pain during

fractures

Describe area and location of same

Displacement – if so, describe

Mechanical Aids

X-rays of plaintiff

If so, were these taken under your supervision

direction and control

Will you interpret same in your possession

What do x-rays show

Point out areas indicating existence of abnormality

Pain and Suffering

Did patient complain of pain in the first examination

Upon what factors is opinion as to existence of pain based

Are a and location of pain as described by plaintiff

Do you have any opinion you can state with reasonable medical

certainty as to whether the pain is real or simulated

If so, state

Anything in examination to cause you to disbelieve complaints of plaintiff

Diagnosis

State diagnosis based on findings as a result of examination

What objective symptoms

Explain what is meant by objective symptoms

What subjective symptoms

What is meant by subjective symptoms

*Do you have any opinion as to the consistency of patient’s history to

 the injury he sustained

What is that opinion

Were the complaints in proportion to your findings

Treatment

General

What treatment administered to plaintiff

How long and with what frequency did such treatments continue

Hospitalization

Was plaintiff hospitalized

If so, for how long

How often saw plaintiff in hospital

Operations

Surgery on plaintiff

Describe

Subsequent surgery

Drugs

Nature and extent of drugs and medicines required in treatment of

plaintiff

Plaintiff still on drugs

Therapy

Did plaintiff undergo physiotherapy.  If so, what type

For how long period of time were treatments rendered and by whom

Did plaintiff undergo psychotherapy

If so, describe

For how long a period of time


Pain During Treatment

Was plaintiff in pain during course of treatment

Was plaintiff disabled during treatment

Was pain constant or of a recurring nature

Disability During Treatment

Was plaintiff disabled during treatment

If so, to what extent

Last Examination

Last time examined by plaintiff

Condition at that time

Was plaintiff observed to be in pain at that time

Character and severity of pain at that time

Plaintiff still disabled at that time

To what extent

Plaintiff still require use of mechanical therapeutic device

Prognosis

Future treatment and expense of same

Do you have an opinion you can state with reasonable medical

certainty the length of time such treatment will have to continue and the

probable necessary expense of thee treatments

Future pain and suffering

     ***        Do you have an opinion you can express with reasonable medical certainty

as to whether plaintiff will in the future continue to suffer pain as a result of his injuries

Will you so state

On what factors do you base your opinion in this respect

Future Disability/Limitations

         *Can you state with reasonable medical certainty whether plaintiff will

have permanent disability (or continue temporary disability)

If so, will you please give us your best estimate as to the percentage of

disability

Statement for Services

Have you rendered a bill to plaintiff for services

Amount of bill

Is this reasonable for like services in this area

Client Reviews
  • My wife and I were hit by a tractor trailer in 2014. After extensive research online, we were deeply impressed with the various reviews we read on Google and Avvo and chose Chris to represent us. We could not have a made a better decision. Chris and his firm treated us like we were their only clients, soothed our worries, and instantly gained our trust. Chris settled both of our cases for more than we expected.
    ★★★★★
  • A co-worker of my wife recommended Chris to us. At the very beginning Chris showed that he cared and his knowledge is priceless. Going through this process can be aggravating but Chris did a great job guiding me through this and was always available to answer my questions. Chris fought to get what I deserved even though at times I wanted to give up.
    ★★★★★
  • I want to express my deepest sense of gratitude and appreciation to Attorney Chris Simon & Attorney Chris Carsten, for all the hard work that they put forth into my case (car accident filed after being hit by drunk driver). Their attention to detail and professionalism far surpasses their firm's reputation. Because of their diligence and dedication to their craft, they were able to bring my case to a successful close, one that I could live with. You will not find a better team for your case. Should I have a need for their services again in the future, or know of anyone looking for a top notch Auto Accident Law Firm, I would not hesitate to recommend them!!!!
    ★★★★★
  • Wow...Chris is a very good attorney. Me and my son was in a very bad car accident an I was clueless on how to handle the situation. It's very hard to find an attorney who allows you to contact them personally instead of you contacting their asst. I was told that I didn't have a case because the hosiptal put a lien on my acct. Chris prove different and I was able to file my case with the insurance company. The process was very quickly and Im glad I selected the right attorney..Thanks Chris
    ★★★★★
  • Chris is a great lawyer and the most people friendly attorney I have ever delt with. He handled my case with great attention to detail and did so in a very short period of time. He is very consice, efficient, patient and understanding. He has a strong passion for what he does and he does it well. I recommend Chris Simon as legal representation for anyone who has suffreed damages or a loss at the negligence of others. He really cares about you and your case.
    ★★★★★