Non-CDL Drivers in Commercial Vehicles in Georgia

Mrs. T's vehicle was struck by a commercial panel truck that was owned by a beverage company in Atlanta, Concepts.  As a result of the accident, Ms. Thompson required medical care in excess of $86,000.00.

Concepts, at the time of the accident, the driver of their commercial truck didn’t have a commercial driver’s license (CDL) which is legal if you are operating a commercial motor vehicle under 26,000 pounds.

The Georgia commercial vehicle 150- mile radius non-CDL driver rule states:

1. Drivers of property-carrying commercial vehicles that stay within a 150 air mile radius are not required to have a CDL, and there is an exception to the record of duty log and 14 hour rules.

2. Under this exception, drivers are allowed to extend their 14-hour period by 2 hours twice a week and can maintain a time record in lieu of a time log.

3. Non-CDL drivers include any driver that operates property-carrying commercial vehicles that weigh more than 10,001 pounds but less than 26,000 pounds, that includes many box trucks and delivery motor vehicles.

There are, however, specific requirements to the 150-mile radius non-CDL rule. A non-cdl driver who operates a property-carrying commercial vehicle that does not require a CDL is not required under Part 282 is exempt from the log requirements and the 14- hour rule if:

1. The driver operates within a 150 air-mile radius of the location where the driver reports to and is released from work. and

2. The driver returns to their normal work reporting location at the end of each duty tour; and

3. The driver doesn’t drive after the 14th hour after coming on duty on 5 days of any period of 7 consecutive days, or after the 16th hour after coming on duty 2 days of any period of 7 consecutive days; and

3. The motor carrier that employs the driver maintains for 6 months, accurate records showing the time the driver reports for duty each day, the total number of hours the driver is on duty each day, and the time the driver is released from duty each day (and the total time for the preceding 7 days for drivers used for the first time, intermittently.

Georgia Commercial Vehicle 150-Mile Radius Non-CDL and V.Thompson

In the V. Thompson case, the owners of the truck that struck Mrs. Thompson, didn’t dispute the fact that they failed to use any type of timekeeping system for any of their drivers. Concepts also didn’t dispute that had they checked even the scan gun check-ins, it would have been obvious that the driver who struck Ms. Thompson had been working dangerously long days for a number of years. What’s worse, the Safety Director at Concepts testified she relied on Donegal Insurance Group and didn’t know the Georgia regulations regarding commercial vehicles.

The week of the crash, the driver for Concepts that struck Ms. Thompson had worked approximately 65 hours and testified that no one bothered to review his hours on the job.  In addition, he kept exceeding the allowable hours the week after the accident. The Safety Director at Concepts even admitted that the hours the driver that struck Ms. Thompson worked were unsafe, even though they help train the drivers

Also, Concepts relies on Donegal Insurance Group to conduct post-collision safety reviews, and no corrective action was taken after the accident involving Mrs. Thompson on the part of Concepts.

Other Issues

On the day of the accident, the driver for Concepts woke up at 1:00 am to get to work.  He started work at 1:45am and worked all day with no break. He struck Mrs. Thompson at 5:30pm with another 20 minutes left to drive.

The driver of the truck owned by Concepts testified that the brakes were bad on the truck and had been discussed at safety meetings and that the trucks were overloaded the majority of the time.

Had the case gone to trial, we would have filed a direct negligence claim against Donegal Insurance Group and a punitive damages claim against the refreshment company based on reckless disregard for safety, for failing to follow state law, and for failure to monitor the data they had.

Client Reviews
My wife and I were hit by a tractor trailer in 2014. After extensive research online, we were deeply impressed with the various reviews we read on Google and Avvo and chose Chris to represent us. We could not have a made a better decision. Chris and his firm treated us like we were their only clients, soothed our worries, and instantly gained our trust. Chris settled both of our cases for more than we expected. James
A co-worker of my wife recommended Chris to us. At the very beginning Chris showed that he cared and his knowledge is priceless. Going through this process can be aggravating but Chris did a great job guiding me through this and was always available to answer my questions. Chris fought to get what I deserved even though at times I wanted to give up. Tracy
I want to express my deepest sense of gratitude and appreciation to Attorney Chris Simon & Attorney Chris Carsten, for all the hard work that they put forth into my case (car accident filed after being hit by drunk driver). Their attention to detail and professionalism far surpasses their firm's reputation. Because of their diligence and dedication to their craft, they were able to bring my case to a successful close, one that I could live with. You will not find a better team for your case. Should I have a need for their services again in the future, or know of anyone looking for a top notch Auto Accident Law Firm, I would not hesitate to recommend them!!!! Elle
Wow...Chris is a very good attorney. Me and my son was in a very bad car accident an I was clueless on how to handle the situation. It's very hard to find an attorney who allows you to contact them personally instead of you contacting their asst. I was told that I didn't have a case because the hosiptal put a lien on my acct. Chris prove different and I was able to file my case with the insurance company. The process was very quickly and Im glad I selected the right attorney..Thanks Chris A Car Accident client
Chris is a great lawyer and the most people friendly attorney I have ever delt with. He handled my case with great attention to detail and did so in a very short period of time. He is very consice, efficient, patient and understanding. He has a strong passion for what he does and he does it well. I recommend Chris Simon as legal representation for anyone who has suffreed damages or a loss at the negligence of others. He really cares about you and your case. A Car Accident client