Wrongful Death of Children and Parents are Not Together

Few tragedies are worse that the loss of a child and in situations where the parents either never married or have split, there can be confusing legal snarls as to who has the right to file the case.

One of the most heartbreaking situations is where a parent or spouse of the adult child is the at fault party. Normally, there is a strict statutory order of who has the right to bring the wrongful death claim:
  1. the spouse
  2. if there is no spouse, the children.
  3. If there is no spouse or children, the parents of the decedent.
  4. If there is none of the above, then the Court will appoint a representative.
In the practice of law, we have found that every possible fact pattern has a variation on the specifics that can turn an ordinary case into a complex struggle to understand who has the right to bring the case. 

So, what about a situation where a husband and wife are driving along and the husband negligently causes her death by driving recklessly and he survived. 

This very thing happened in a case called Belluso v. Tant  258 GA 453 (2002). The trial court focused only on the code sections and thought that the father of the deceased girl could not bring the case and ruled that the claim lay with the at fault husband. The Appellate Court analyzed the origin of wrongful death claims in Georgia and noted “[T]he wrongful death statute is ‘a legislative imposition of a penalty upon the person who causes the death of another by negligence, the penalty to go to the person injured.’ ” Brock v. Wedincamp, 253 Ga.App. 275, 281, 558 S.E.2d 836 (2002).  The Court reasoned that the purpose of the laws was to punish and if the strict code based order blocked anyone from bringing the suit, that violated the statutory intent. They considered that the Superior Court has equity powers that can override strict language and reasoned that it did not make sense for the husband to be able to lay a claim for his own negligence. 

Accordingly, the father of the deceased adult child was able to bring the claim, effectively divesting the at-fault husband. 

Consider another situation: A Child and Mother are passengers in a vehicle when the driver crashes and kills them both, the child dying before the mother by a matter of seconds. 

The brother of the mother gets himself appointed as the administrator of the Estate of his deceased sister and files the wrongful death lawsuit arguing that the sister survived longer than the child, so the child's claim vested in the Mother and once the Mother passed, it vested in her Estate. The Court analyzed a series of cases and concluded that had the lawsuit actually been filed, the claim for the child's death would have been held by Mom's Estate, but since she only survived briefly, the claim passed onto the child's biological father. 

The Court, in part, held, "(t)hus, where one of the parents of a minor child dies before instituting an action for the child's wrongful death, the representative of that parent's estate is not authorized to bring such an action if there is a surviving parent or other person entitled to bring it." Hosley v. Davidson et al 211 Ga.App. 533 (1994)

Unfortunately for the family, the father had missed the two year statute of limitations and the case likely died in the Appellate Courts. When analyzing wrongful death claims, it is wise to sit down and determine who all of the potential family members are, not only so that the proper claimant brings the case, but also so that all possible vectors of uninsured motorist insurance come into play. 

Keep in mind there are some strange nuances to Underinsured Motorist Claims involving wrongful death. Consider the situation where a mother and father are divorced and the child lives part time at each house. The child is an insured under both policies and the issue is then, do the parents add up the policies and split the proceeds down the middle or each keeps the money for the policy they bought? I would argue it is number one. The decedent is insured under both so the coverage adds up and the parents have to split it evenly.


Client Reviews
★★★★★
My wife and I were hit by a tractor trailer in 2014. After extensive research online, we were deeply impressed with the various reviews we read on Google and Avvo and chose Chris to represent us. We could not have a made a better decision. Chris and his firm treated us like we were their only clients, soothed our worries, and instantly gained our trust. Chris settled both of our cases for more than we expected.
★★★★★
A co-worker of my wife recommended Chris to us. At the very beginning Chris showed that he cared and his knowledge is priceless. Going through this process can be aggravating but Chris did a great job guiding me through this and was always available to answer my questions. Chris fought to get what I deserved even though at times I wanted to give up. Tracy
★★★★★
I want to express my deepest sense of gratitude and appreciation to Attorney Chris Simon & Attorney Chris Carsten, for all the hard work that they put forth into my case (car accident filed after being hit by drunk driver). Their attention to detail and professionalism far surpasses their firm's reputation. Because of their diligence and dedication to their craft, they were able to bring my case to a successful close, one that I could live with. You will not find a better team for your case. Should I have a need for their services again in the future, or know of anyone looking for a top notch Auto Accident Law Firm, I would not hesitate to recommend them!!!! Elle
★★★★★
Wow...Chris is a very good attorney. Me and my son was in a very bad car accident an I was clueless on how to handle the situation. It's very hard to find an attorney who allows you to contact them personally instead of you contacting their asst. I was told that I didn't have a case because the hosiptal put a lien on my acct. Chris prove different and I was able to file my case with the insurance company. The process was very quickly and Im glad I selected the right attorney..Thanks Chris A Car Accident client
★★★★★
Chris is a great lawyer and the most people friendly attorney I have ever delt with. He handled my case with great attention to detail and did so in a very short period of time. He is very consice, efficient, patient and understanding. He has a strong passion for what he does and he does it well. I recommend Chris Simon as legal representation for anyone who has suffreed damages or a loss at the negligence of others. He really cares about you and your case. A Car Accident client