Wrongful Death Shootings and Apportionment Law

Georgia passed a law allowing juries to apportion the amount of blame to all responsible parties, including the plaintiff, in 2005. As of 2017, there have been approximately seven appellate decisions touching on various aspects of the legislation. 

What do juries really do when apportioning liability to a shooter or a negligent actor?  

Example Cases:

Heinz Fojutowski was shot in the stomach which resulted in $500,000 in medical bills and a permanent disability at a high crime motel after the night clerk would not allow him in. The motel had a good amount of prior crime and very little in the way in security. The jury apportioned 66% to the shooter and therefore the motel was liable for 33% of the verdict.

In a 2017 appellate case involving Camelot Club Condominiums in Clayton County, the jury apportioned blame as follows; the shooter 50% responsible, the condo 25% and the security team 25% for the $3.2 million dollar verdict. In an interesting twist, the parties were arguing over whether the condo was responsible for the full 50% (including the 25% on the security company) because security is a non-delegable duty under the law. In other words, they cannot outsource their legal duty and have to pay the full share. Why does it matter? Because it is likely the security team does not have enough insurance to cover their share.




Client Reviews
My wife and I were hit by a tractor trailer in 2014. After extensive research online, we were deeply impressed with the various reviews we read on Google and Avvo and chose Chris to represent us. We could not have a made a better decision. Chris and his firm treated us like we were their only clients, soothed our worries, and instantly gained our trust. Chris settled both of our cases for more than we expected.
★★★★★
A co-worker of my wife recommended Chris to us. At the very beginning Chris showed that he cared and his knowledge is priceless. Going through this process can be aggravating but Chris did a great job guiding me through this and was always available to answer my questions. Chris fought to get what I deserved even though at times I wanted to give up. Tracy
★★★★★
I want to express my deepest sense of gratitude and appreciation to Attorney Chris Simon & Attorney Chris Carsten, for all the hard work that they put forth into my case (car accident filed after being hit by drunk driver). Their attention to detail and professionalism far surpasses their firm's reputation. Because of their diligence and dedication to their craft, they were able to bring my case to a successful close, one that I could live with. You will not find a better team for your case. Should I have a need for their services again in the future, or know of anyone looking for a top notch Auto Accident Law Firm, I would not hesitate to recommend them!!!! Elle
★★★★★
Wow...Chris is a very good attorney. Me and my son was in a very bad car accident an I was clueless on how to handle the situation. It's very hard to find an attorney who allows you to contact them personally instead of you contacting their asst. I was told that I didn't have a case because the hosiptal put a lien on my acct. Chris prove different and I was able to file my case with the insurance company. The process was very quickly and Im glad I selected the right attorney..Thanks Chris A Car Accident client
★★★★★
Chris is a great lawyer and the most people friendly attorney I have ever delt with. He handled my case with great attention to detail and did so in a very short period of time. He is very consice, efficient, patient and understanding. He has a strong passion for what he does and he does it well. I recommend Chris Simon as legal representation for anyone who has suffreed damages or a loss at the negligence of others. He really cares about you and your case. A Car Accident client
★★★★★